After reading a codinghorror article I came across this in a comment:Good programmers also figure out their best method of self-learning. I'm one of the oddballs that reads the entire manual.
That
struck me as interesting. I know I learn in what's probably quite an
unusual way. I'd be interested to know how other people here learn.
I teach myself new stuff in a very
exploratory way. For each of the new languages I've learned since
starting at justin.tv I've spent probably five or ten minutes learning
the syntax. Then I jump in and start writing a real program that needs
to be released within a week or so. I usually start by writing a "hello
world" program, and just add stuff to that until it does what I want
(of course, as I learn new tricks I frequently remove a bunch
of stuff). If the language has a REPL I use it constantly. If not, I
fake it by just printing expressions in my program, and working in a
tight loop of editing and running the program again and again to see
how the output changes.
I rarely use a reference at this stage
unless it's to achieve something concrete. For example, I find myself
googling things like "actionscript string search", but only after
trying a couple of likely-seeming things myself (i.e. I'll actually
just write things like trace("foobar".find("bar")) and
trace("foobar".index("bar")), etc until the compiler stops whining or I
run out of things to try).
Funnily enough, after I've written a real program that works, and I feel like I understand the language a bit, then
I go back and read the reference books thoroughly. It doesn't work the
other way for me - I need to have had the exploratory phase and built
up some context so that I can read the books properly (and it's fun to
read the books at that point and remember how I "discovered" each
feature that's discussed).
Source:
YCombinator
For me, mostly through the
ASSISTA system, hence its development.
An online auction for the Internet domain name montana.com ended Monday with a bid of more than $300,000.
At that price, however, it was no deal.
"For us, the eBay auction was a chance to see what it's worth in that setting, and the price did not meet our expectations,"? said Kevin Amazon, director of sales and marketing for site owner Blackfoot Telecommunications Group in Missoula. "So we're going to retain the site and we'll be looking at building a model for it that works for everyone."?
The rights to montana.com went up for auction on eBay a week ago. By Monday morning, the domain name had drawn 31 bids, including the last one at $310,100. As noted on the eBay site, the seller's reserve price had not been met. That means the seller can accept the highest bid, but doesn't have to.
Amazon wouldn't specify Blackfoot's price, but said the bid was "quite a bit lower"? than the company believes the site's value to be.
"We believe the name is pretty valuable and that the auction didn't really value the site fairly, which is fine,"? Amazon said. "For us, it's really about doing due diligence as we set a value and try to make the site a workable site."?
Source:
Missoulian
More on Montana.com from Michael Berken's
The Domains.
I have been watching the progress of Shoppers.com and the auction just finished at Pool. With 15 minutes left the bid price was $65,000 usd. With 12 minutes left the bid price jumped to $75,000. With 10 minutes left, it jumped to $88,000 on 65 bids. With 8 minutes left, it cracked the 6 figure mark and hit $101,000 on 69 bids. 7 minutes left it jumped up to $103,000. 5 minutes upto $113,000 . 4 min $126,000 then to $130,000.
Source:
Dot WeeklyA couple of friends asked my opinion on this domain last few days. My personal take was it is not something I would spend much on. Maybe 10k-20k if I'm drunk (and I don't drink) but 160K range? Too many things need to be aligned in order to make it work at that price. Not impossible by any means however I do believe there are much better opportunities on other domains out there.
Sahar
Recent comments