<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding The Good In The Bad: How LH.Com Arbitration Loss May Be Good For Domainers</title>
	<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Battle Over Jackass.com &#124; Finley &#38; Cook, PLLC</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-11546</link>
		<dc:creator>The Battle Over Jackass.com &#124; Finley &#38; Cook, PLLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-11546</guid>
		<description>[...] behind it (good luck Thunayan!), there are good chances there will be such a decision,&#8221; blogged Sahar Sarid. &#8220;I’m looking forward to watching the nightmare they got themselves [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] behind it (good luck Thunayan!), there are good chances there will be such a decision,&#8221; blogged Sahar Sarid. &#8220;I’m looking forward to watching the nightmare they got themselves [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icma2002.Com &#187; The Battle Over Jackass.com</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-11542</link>
		<dc:creator>Icma2002.Com &#187; The Battle Over Jackass.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-11542</guid>
		<description>[...] behind it (good luck Thunayan!), there are good chances there will be such a decision,&#8221; blogged Sahar Sarid. &#8220;I’m looking forward to watching the nightmare they got themselves [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] behind it (good luck Thunayan!), there are good chances there will be such a decision,&#8221; blogged Sahar Sarid. &#8220;I’m looking forward to watching the nightmare they got themselves [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domisfera &#187; Articulo &#187; AL-Ghanim ha perdido (de momento) el dominio lh.com</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-8602</link>
		<dc:creator>Domisfera &#187; Articulo &#187; AL-Ghanim ha perdido (de momento) el dominio lh.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-8602</guid>
		<description>[...] el proceso. En todo caso, y a pesar del resultado final, la demanda judicial sigue adelante. Para Sahar Sarid, hay bastantes posibilidades de que Elequa gane en los tribunales y augura que esta demanda [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] el proceso. En todo caso, y a pesar del resultado final, la demanda judicial sigue adelante. Para Sahar Sarid, hay bastantes posibilidades de que Elequa gane en los tribunales y augura que esta demanda [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Schoenne</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-8582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Schoenne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-8582</guid>
		<description>I have a problem with NAF.  I have just lost a domain name through a ruling.  Unfortunately I was not given a reasonable amount of time to launch a defense.  Briefly NAF indicated that they sent notification of the case to me via fax, email and post.  I did not get an email and I did not get a fax.  The case via mail took 2 weeks and NAF really has no way of knowing if I received that either (it did not come registered).  

Because the mailed documents were received so late I was unable to mount a defense of the name.  

In my opinion the way in which NAF notifies the defendant is flawed and I suggest that there may be a case here.  NAF has no way to prove that the defendant received either the email, fax or the documents through the post.  So what I'm saying is that the notification process is flawed and in some cases takes away the rights of the defendant.

Does any one agree?  If you think there is something, or this has happened to you, I'd love to talk.  email me at bruce@exceldomains.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with NAF.  I have just lost a domain name through a ruling.  Unfortunately I was not given a reasonable amount of time to launch a defense.  Briefly NAF indicated that they sent notification of the case to me via fax, email and post.  I did not get an email and I did not get a fax.  The case via mail took 2 weeks and NAF really has no way of knowing if I received that either (it did not come registered).  </p>
<p>Because the mailed documents were received so late I was unable to mount a defense of the name.  </p>
<p>In my opinion the way in which NAF notifies the defendant is flawed and I suggest that there may be a case here.  NAF has no way to prove that the defendant received either the email, fax or the documents through the post.  So what I&#8217;m saying is that the notification process is flawed and in some cases takes away the rights of the defendant.</p>
<p>Does any one agree?  If you think there is something, or this has happened to you, I&#8217;d love to talk.  email me at <a href="mailto:bruce@exceldomains.com">bruce@exceldomains.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-8554</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/28/finding-the-good-in-the-bad-how-lhcom-arbitration-loss-may-be-good-for-domainers/#comment-8554</guid>
		<description>Agree. While FMA beating Hitler's favorite airline won't be legally binding for WIPO/UDRP cases, it will be further excellent legal support for domain owners; and especially so for LL, LLL, LLLL, etc cases.

Furthermore, it will prove additionally valuable for US-based domain owners needing/electing to use US courts to stop these illegal Internet land grabs.

We all owe FMA/Thunayan a big thanks for fighting the good fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree. While FMA beating Hitler&#8217;s favorite airline won&#8217;t be legally binding for WIPO/UDRP cases, it will be further excellent legal support for domain owners; and especially so for LL, LLL, LLLL, etc cases.</p>
<p>Furthermore, it will prove additionally valuable for US-based domain owners needing/electing to use US courts to stop these illegal Internet land grabs.</p>
<p>We all owe FMA/Thunayan a big thanks for fighting the good fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
