<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do The Best Domain Names Pass &#8220;The Sinatra Test&#8221;?</title>
	<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eclipse Galileo SR1 (3.5.1): enterprise polish - Peter Hendriks - blog community</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-13572</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclipse Galileo SR1 (3.5.1): enterprise polish - Peter Hendriks - blog community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-13572</guid>
		<description>[...] with tons of projects and millions of lines of code. In many ways, Google is the ultimate &#8220;Sinatra Test&#8221; for scaling Eclipse, and the talks show some interesting problems and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] with tons of projects and millions of lines of code. In many ways, Google is the ultimate &ldquo;Sinatra Test&rdquo; for scaling Eclipse, and the talks show some interesting problems and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-8042</link>
		<dc:creator>eric shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-8042</guid>
		<description>my experience agrees with you wholeheartedly!  a great domain is just the wind at your back but better there than having it in your face. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my experience agrees with you wholeheartedly!  a great domain is just the wind at your back but better there than having it in your face. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh/Swerve</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-7994</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh/Swerve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-7994</guid>
		<description>Blood, sweat and tears, 100 hour work weeks, unless you are lucky or very lucky.

Side tangent: I don't think PalmSprings.com is a typical generic domain.  

It's got brand written all over it and spilling over the sides.  And the initial core branding began along time ago, before Vint Cerf began surfing.

First time i'd ever heard of Palm Springs was in the early 70's, and i'm from the backwoods of Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blood, sweat and tears, 100 hour work weeks, unless you are lucky or very lucky.</p>
<p>Side tangent: I don&#8217;t think PalmSprings.com is a typical generic domain.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s got brand written all over it and spilling over the sides.  And the initial core branding began along time ago, before Vint Cerf began surfing.</p>
<p>First time i&#8217;d ever heard of Palm Springs was in the early 70&#8217;s, and i&#8217;m from the backwoods of Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Empedocles</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-7973</link>
		<dc:creator>Empedocles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-7973</guid>
		<description>I found your answer re Apr 11th, 2008 at 7:55 pm very suprising  "I would say sales pitch is a sales pitch is a sales pitch. Having a generic domain in your sales pitch is as good as having a made-up domain. It is not the domain that sells, it is the sales person"  So much intrinsic name value, search engine ranking or possible type in traffic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your answer re Apr 11th, 2008 at 7:55 pm very suprising  &#8220;I would say sales pitch is a sales pitch is a sales pitch. Having a generic domain in your sales pitch is as good as having a made-up domain. It is not the domain that sells, it is the sales person&#8221;  So much intrinsic name value, search engine ranking or possible type in traffic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazzip</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-7914</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazzip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/11/do-the-best-domain-names-pass-the-sinatra-test/#comment-7914</guid>
		<description>I would imagine Funeralhomes.com would be far harder and much more expensive to sell and run compared to the power of a geo domain like PalmSprings.com for a number or practical reasons.

Comparing domain for domain is not very realistic IMO, all premium domains are not created equal.

Both fantastic names but the Geo one would most definetly be my choice between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would imagine Funeralhomes.com would be far harder and much more expensive to sell and run compared to the power of a geo domain like PalmSprings.com for a number or practical reasons.</p>
<p>Comparing domain for domain is not very realistic IMO, all premium domains are not created equal.</p>
<p>Both fantastic names but the Geo one would most definetly be my choice between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
