<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain Bits: ICANN Says: Domaining is Bad</title>
	<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/08/domain-bits-icann-says-domaining-is-bad/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jothan</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/08/domain-bits-icann-says-domaining-is-bad/#comment-7725</link>
		<dc:creator>Jothan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/08/domain-bits-icann-says-domaining-is-bad/#comment-7725</guid>
		<description>I am going to step up publicly defend Paul Twomey on this one.  He just would not say such things.

Having had conversations with him, he sincerely appreciates that there is a large silent majority of good actors in the domainer community, he respects that there is legitimacy to the domain marketplace, and he would not make such statements as are being quoted in the article.

The editor of the article is clearly making editorial opinion and it is unfortunately not clearly deliniated between where that is happening and Paul's actual quotes exist so it all appears as Paul speaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to step up publicly defend Paul Twomey on this one.  He just would not say such things.</p>
<p>Having had conversations with him, he sincerely appreciates that there is a large silent majority of good actors in the domainer community, he respects that there is legitimacy to the domain marketplace, and he would not make such statements as are being quoted in the article.</p>
<p>The editor of the article is clearly making editorial opinion and it is unfortunately not clearly deliniated between where that is happening and Paul&#8217;s actual quotes exist so it all appears as Paul speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Keenan</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/08/domain-bits-icann-says-domaining-is-bad/#comment-7706</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/08/domain-bits-icann-says-domaining-is-bad/#comment-7706</guid>
		<description>I am the media advisor here at ICANN. I have discussed this news report with Paul Twomey and he has asked me to clarity that the Gulf News article incorrectly suggests that he has concerns with domainers.

As he said to me:  "When asked to look ahead at what might happen on the Internet, I did say it was likely domainers would move increasingly into the ccTLD space. In no way did I say or suggest that domainers were a negative force in any way and certainly did not refer to them as "a downside." The many domainers I have met and chatted with at meetings across the globe will know I would never say such a thing.

As I noted in my closing remarks at the Dubai meeting, the marketplace has evolved and domainers are a part of the robust domain name market that exists today."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the media advisor here at ICANN. I have discussed this news report with Paul Twomey and he has asked me to clarity that the Gulf News article incorrectly suggests that he has concerns with domainers.</p>
<p>As he said to me:  &#8220;When asked to look ahead at what might happen on the Internet, I did say it was likely domainers would move increasingly into the ccTLD space. In no way did I say or suggest that domainers were a negative force in any way and certainly did not refer to them as &#8220;a downside.&#8221; The many domainers I have met and chatted with at meetings across the globe will know I would never say such a thing.</p>
<p>As I noted in my closing remarks at the Dubai meeting, the marketplace has evolved and domainers are a part of the robust domain name market that exists today.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/08/domain-bits-icann-says-domaining-is-bad/#comment-7619</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/08/domain-bits-icann-says-domaining-is-bad/#comment-7619</guid>
		<description>Idiots like Mr Twomey really help drive home a key point about the world we're in .... developing is key.

Aside from the ICA, its going to provide the strongest pre-emptive legal defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiots like Mr Twomey really help drive home a key point about the world we&#8217;re in &#8230;. developing is key.</p>
<p>Aside from the ICA, its going to provide the strongest pre-emptive legal defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Mintz</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/08/domain-bits-icann-says-domaining-is-bad/#comment-7601</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Mintz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/08/domain-bits-icann-says-domaining-is-bad/#comment-7601</guid>
		<description>Well, Sahar, everybody knows that all domainers are cybersquatters just like all SEO's are spammers :.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Sahar, everybody knows that all domainers are cybersquatters just like all SEO&#8217;s are spammers :.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
