<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And Our Best Domain Names Are &#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7283</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7283</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, Sahar. Love the story about Spyware.com. That's like going to a flea market and finding a twenty carat canary diamond in the custom jewelry bin.

----answer----

Thanks David.. yea, got lucky on this one however when you play with the volume we do, luck is inevitable.

Sahar
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Sahar. Love the story about Spyware.com. That&#8217;s like going to a flea market and finding a twenty carat canary diamond in the custom jewelry bin.</p>
<p>&#8212;-answer&#8212;-</p>
<p>Thanks David.. yea, got lucky on this one however when you play with the volume we do, luck is inevitable.</p>
<p>Sahar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Green</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7258</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7258</guid>
		<description>Funny thing is, before snapnames adopted the auction format. $60.00 could pretty much guarantee you a generic domain name once you put a snap on it. Granted, this was pre-summer 2004!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing is, before snapnames adopted the auction format. $60.00 could pretty much guarantee you a generic domain name once you put a snap on it. Granted, this was pre-summer 2004!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7217</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7217</guid>
		<description>Hi Sahar,

Thanks for the advice. Looks like I shall start investing in these type of domains from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sahar,</p>
<p>Thanks for the advice. Looks like I shall start investing in these type of domains from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7209</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7209</guid>
		<description>$3,ooo per day PPC for Spyware.com. DAMM, that's nice!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$3,ooo per day PPC for Spyware.com. DAMM, that&#8217;s nice!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7185</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/04/02/and-our-best-domain-names-are/#comment-7185</guid>
		<description>Nice blog entry, thanks for sharing.  This helps give other domainers ideas.  One of the things you pointed out that anyone can do, is to look for terms and words that aren't popular now but may be in the future.  Not something to base your whole strategy on, but if you watch the news and do a lot of reading, you can pick up on some terms like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog entry, thanks for sharing.  This helps give other domainers ideas.  One of the things you pointed out that anyone can do, is to look for terms and words that aren&#8217;t popular now but may be in the future.  Not something to base your whole strategy on, but if you watch the news and do a lot of reading, you can pick up on some terms like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
