<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simplicity Rules!</title>
	<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-7330</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-7330</guid>
		<description>Sahar,
I have  v. simple questions for you.

'7. What is the advertising pressure for the keyword, related keywords? (number of bidders on Google, Yahoo, and prices)

8. What is the estimated traffic numbers for the domain'

1) Where do you go to find actual number of bidders and prices?

2) Where and how you find out estimated traffic numbers for the domains?

Any help as  where to find this info. will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Great work Sahar. Love it.

-----answer----

Research research research. We used to collect a lot of data direct from the search engines (overture/yahoo, google), buy a lot of data. Not sure where to collect it these days as it is not our main business anymore.

Good luck!

Sahar


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sahar,<br />
I have  v. simple questions for you.</p>
<p>&#8216;7. What is the advertising pressure for the keyword, related keywords? (number of bidders on Google, Yahoo, and prices)</p>
<p>8. What is the estimated traffic numbers for the domain&#8217;</p>
<p>1) Where do you go to find actual number of bidders and prices?</p>
<p>2) Where and how you find out estimated traffic numbers for the domains?</p>
<p>Any help as  where to find this info. will be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
<p>Great work Sahar. Love it.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;answer&#8212;-</p>
<p>Research research research. We used to collect a lot of data direct from the search engines (overture/yahoo, google), buy a lot of data. Not sure where to collect it these days as it is not our main business anymore.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
<p>Sahar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-6677</link>
		<dc:creator>Amir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-6677</guid>
		<description>The question "Does it make sense?"? fits well with the domains listed by me at www.DomainWishes.com You can make an offer on any domain or domain groups listed on the site, for further consideration.

The names were chosen because they represent a clearly growing or already established industry in addition to fitting logically with their top-level extension(such as JohnDoe.Info, CutTheCord.mobi, etc'), making them intuitive to type, easy to remember, PPC-friendly, and straightforward to brand.

I believe considering ALL 8 points described by Sahar as a marker for good domain valuation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question &#8220;Does it make sense?&#8221;? fits well with the domains listed by me at <a href="http://www.DomainWishes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.DomainWishes.com</a> You can make an offer on any domain or domain groups listed on the site, for further consideration.</p>
<p>The names were chosen because they represent a clearly growing or already established industry in addition to fitting logically with their top-level extension(such as JohnDoe.Info, CutTheCord.mobi, etc&#8217;), making them intuitive to type, easy to remember, PPC-friendly, and straightforward to brand.</p>
<p>I believe considering ALL 8 points described by Sahar as a marker for good domain valuation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-6655</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-6655</guid>
		<description>The "Does it make sense?" may be one of the hardest parts for people to figure out when domaining. A name "Making sense" is a very subjective thing at times and most people tend to think that their version of "making sense" must be right.  Often the right "pick" has a lot to do with choosing what everyone else would pick, if they were in the same shoes you were in. . . and being honest with yourself about that.

----answer----

Well said Adam,

Cheers

Sahar
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Does it make sense?&#8221; may be one of the hardest parts for people to figure out when domaining. A name &#8220;Making sense&#8221; is a very subjective thing at times and most people tend to think that their version of &#8220;making sense&#8221; must be right.  Often the right &#8220;pick&#8221; has a lot to do with choosing what everyone else would pick, if they were in the same shoes you were in. . . and being honest with yourself about that.</p>
<p>&#8212;-answer&#8212;-</p>
<p>Well said Adam,</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Sahar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Stankiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-6564</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Stankiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-6564</guid>
		<description>We have a portfolio of a few dozen domains, some new - some old. Many auctions for a top names have no worked to our luck and we started a ebay domain store but since we have 0 feedbacks - I think bidders think we are scammers and stay away. Estibot claims our portfolio is worth between 200-300K  for about 40 names we have. Could anyone estimate what they feel these 5 domains are worth to see if we are in the same area: ReviewWrite.com - DevelopmentProduct.com - GardensProducts.com - ReviewsFilm.com - ProvideCustomers.com which are all for sale. We stay away from PPC Totally and redirect traffic to one of our properties. I buy strictly for the keyword terms - not traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a portfolio of a few dozen domains, some new - some old. Many auctions for a top names have no worked to our luck and we started a ebay domain store but since we have 0 feedbacks - I think bidders think we are scammers and stay away. Estibot claims our portfolio is worth between 200-300K  for about 40 names we have. Could anyone estimate what they feel these 5 domains are worth to see if we are in the same area: ReviewWrite.com - DevelopmentProduct.com - GardensProducts.com - ReviewsFilm.com - ProvideCustomers.com which are all for sale. We stay away from PPC Totally and redirect traffic to one of our properties. I buy strictly for the keyword terms - not traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-6540</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/03/18/simplicity-rules/#comment-6540</guid>
		<description>[...] Sahar breaks down how he evaluates domains beyond traffic numbers: &#8220;Too many in the domain industry are buying domains solely based on traffic, not understanding that traffic is one aspect of the domain, and really isn't the main one.&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sahar breaks down how he evaluates domains beyond traffic numbers: &#8220;Too many in the domain industry are buying domains solely based on traffic, not understanding that traffic is one aspect of the domain, and really isn&#8217;t the main one.&#8220; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
