<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dot Weekly: Shoppers.com Sold For USD161K</title>
	<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/05/shopperscom-goes-for-usd161k/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Shoppers.com expires and gets pooled for $161,000&#160;by&#160;DomainHolics.com</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/05/shopperscom-goes-for-usd161k/#comment-6075</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Shoppers.com expires and gets pooled for $161,000&#160;by&#160;DomainHolics.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/05/shopperscom-goes-for-usd161k/#comment-6075</guid>
		<description>[...] Edit: I&#8217;m not the only one who thinks $161k was too high. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Edit: I&#8217;m not the only one who thinks $161k was too high. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire: How Did Pool Score Shoppers.com? A Glitch. at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/05/shopperscom-goes-for-usd161k/#comment-5509</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire: How Did Pool Score Shoppers.com? A Glitch. at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/05/shopperscom-goes-for-usd161k/#comment-5509</guid>
		<description>[...] Shoppers.com and selling it for $166,000 through its auction. Although the value of the domain is debatable, the bigger question is how Pool landed the domain since it was registered at Network Solutions, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Shoppers.com and selling it for $166,000 through its auction. Although the value of the domain is debatable, the bigger question is how Pool landed the domain since it was registered at Network Solutions, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; How Did Pool Score Shoppers.com? - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/05/shopperscom-goes-for-usd161k/#comment-5508</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; How Did Pool Score Shoppers.com? - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/05/shopperscom-goes-for-usd161k/#comment-5508</guid>
		<description>[...] Shoppers.com and selling it for $166,000 through its auction. Although the value of the domain is debatable, the bigger question is how Pool landed the domain since it was registered at Network Solutions, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Shoppers.com and selling it for $166,000 through its auction. Although the value of the domain is debatable, the bigger question is how Pool landed the domain since it was registered at Network Solutions, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/05/shopperscom-goes-for-usd161k/#comment-5477</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/05/shopperscom-goes-for-usd161k/#comment-5477</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I think that's overpriced myself. It's not a huge traffic keyword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I think that&#8217;s overpriced myself. It&#8217;s not a huge traffic keyword.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
