<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Killing The Domain Channel?</title>
	<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5553</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5553</guid>
		<description>Just read your post, Julia. Whypark is basically a website auto-generator. This is the same thing Blackhat SEO's use to build gigantic networks of websites. Nothing wrong or illegal about this, but as far as Google is concerned it is just spam. Blackhat SEO's have been having their Adsense accounts banned for years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read your post, Julia. Whypark is basically a website auto-generator. This is the same thing Blackhat SEO&#8217;s use to build gigantic networks of websites. Nothing wrong or illegal about this, but as far as Google is concerned it is just spam. Blackhat SEO&#8217;s have been having their Adsense accounts banned for years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5552</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5552</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of "bad" traffic in the domain channel. The domain channel also contains some of the best of the best traffic. Google has done an extremely good job of keeping the quality in check; Yahoo has not. Because of this, all of Yahoo's syndicated traffic is undervalued.

Julia, what the hell is MFA? Is the United Press International's web site MFA, because it sure looks like it -- http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Science/2008/02/10/space_mission_postponed/9889/

This has absolutely nothing to do with how a web site looks. It has to do with traffic quality. Traffic quality is measured only by numbers. Google's "MFA" crackdown was nothing of the sort; it was an arbitrage crackdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of &#8220;bad&#8221; traffic in the domain channel. The domain channel also contains some of the best of the best traffic. Google has done an extremely good job of keeping the quality in check; Yahoo has not. Because of this, all of Yahoo&#8217;s syndicated traffic is undervalued.</p>
<p>Julia, what the hell is MFA? Is the United Press International&#8217;s web site MFA, because it sure looks like it &#8212; <a href="http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Science/2008/02/10/space_mission_postponed/9889/" rel="nofollow">http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Science/2008/02/10/space_mission_postponed/9889/</a></p>
<p>This has absolutely nothing to do with how a web site looks. It has to do with traffic quality. Traffic quality is measured only by numbers. Google&#8217;s &#8220;MFA&#8221; crackdown was nothing of the sort; it was an arbitrage crackdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo! Tells Microsoft to Bid $40 a Share - Smart SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5543</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo! Tells Microsoft to Bid $40 a Share - Smart SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5543</guid>
		<description>[...] partners a smaller piece of the pie and have a tighter control of the ad market. Google recently killed Ask's sub-syndication deal.  Marchex posts Q4 results on the 14th. If they underperform they may have to start layoffs, cut [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] partners a smaller piece of the pie and have a tighter control of the ad market. Google recently killed Ask&#8217;s sub-syndication deal.  Marchex posts Q4 results on the 14th. If they underperform they may have to start layoffs, cut [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5474</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5474</guid>
		<description>Obviously my article originally so i wont comment on that.

My take on the situation is that, with Google now doing a mass clean out of MFA sites and MFA providers, they are setting their stall out as the "clean" ad network. By the time Yahoosoft / MicroHoo roll out their platform its likely to be full of arbitragers, cruddy domains and bad traffic - all of which will damage any new ad network they try and sell to the advertisers..

J :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously my article originally so i wont comment on that.</p>
<p>My take on the situation is that, with Google now doing a mass clean out of MFA sites and MFA providers, they are setting their stall out as the &#8220;clean&#8221; ad network. By the time Yahoosoft / MicroHoo roll out their platform its likely to be full of arbitragers, cruddy domains and bad traffic - all of which will damage any new ad network they try and sell to the advertisers..</p>
<p>J <img src='http://www.conceptualist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil @king.net</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5436</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil @king.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2008/02/02/is-google-killing-the-domain-channel/#comment-5436</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you btothec.

Can we all boycott Google and move to Yahoo? I guess this is a question where domaineer will not consider doing it. I'm one of them.

What other options do we have?

Regards,
Emil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you btothec.</p>
<p>Can we all boycott Google and move to Yahoo? I guess this is a question where domaineer will not consider doing it. I&#8217;m one of them.</p>
<p>What other options do we have?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Emil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
