<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wipo Gives Elders.com To Comlainant, Finds Respondant Has &#8220;No Rights Or Legitimate Interest&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cedric</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2400</link>
		<dc:creator>Cedric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2400</guid>
		<description>But WIPO refused to transfer elders.net to the same complainant (see http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2007/d2007-1099.html).
The respondent in this dispute is a former franchisee of the complainant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But WIPO refused to transfer elders.net to the same complainant (see <a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2007/d2007-1099.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2007/d2007-1099.html</a>).<br />
The respondent in this dispute is a former franchisee of the complainant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GH</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2379</link>
		<dc:creator>GH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2379</guid>
		<description>Trust me you can win a UDRP get a Reverse Domain Hijacking ruling and still lose the if they take ou to Civil Court.

----ANSWER----

I know..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me you can win a UDRP get a Reverse Domain Hijacking ruling and still lose the if they take ou to Civil Court.</p>
<p>&#8212;-ANSWER&#8212;-</p>
<p>I know..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2363</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2363</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, large companies with deep pockets will always take advantage of this situation.

Assume a small time domainer has a domain which is a few thousand dollars in value and is slapped with an absurd trademark infringement lawsuit. This lawsuit will only cost the complainant 1K - 2K max.

For the domainer to defend, he/she will have to deposit at least $50,000 with a lawyer, just to make an appearance in court. Do you think the domainer will defend the case? I doubt it.

So, most probably the case will result in a default judgement and domain will just go to the complainant. I cannot figure out a way how domainers are protected from this, if anybody knows how, do advice!

Al, 
DNHour.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, large companies with deep pockets will always take advantage of this situation.</p>
<p>Assume a small time domainer has a domain which is a few thousand dollars in value and is slapped with an absurd trademark infringement lawsuit. This lawsuit will only cost the complainant 1K - 2K max.</p>
<p>For the domainer to defend, he/she will have to deposit at least $50,000 with a lawyer, just to make an appearance in court. Do you think the domainer will defend the case? I doubt it.</p>
<p>So, most probably the case will result in a default judgement and domain will just go to the complainant. I cannot figure out a way how domainers are protected from this, if anybody knows how, do advice!</p>
<p>Al,<br />
DNHour.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domisfera &#187; Articulo &#187; Aumente cómodamente su patrimonio con un genérico, caso elders.com</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2314</link>
		<dc:creator>Domisfera &#187; Articulo &#187; Aumente cómodamente su patrimonio con un genérico, caso elders.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2314</guid>
		<description>[...] WIPO, Conceptualist) Noticias [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] WIPO, Conceptualist) Noticias [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2310</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/09/13/wipo-gives-elderscom-to-comlainant-finds-respondant-has-no-rights-or-legitimate-interest/#comment-2310</guid>
		<description>Our legal system working at it best, efficient and with lack of rationale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our legal system working at it best, efficient and with lack of rationale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
