<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google To Offer &#8220;Opt Out&#8221; Option From &#8220;Adsense For Domains&#8221; To Adwords Advertisers</title>
	<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/08/03/coming-soon-opt-out-option-for-adsense-for-domains-advertisers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/08/03/coming-soon-opt-out-option-for-adsense-for-domains-advertisers/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/08/03/coming-soon-opt-out-option-for-adsense-for-domains-advertisers/#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>Hi Sahar.  Thanks for the link.

Blocking all parked domains via AdWords is not the best solution.  I do think a win-win-win (for Google and advertisers and domainers) would be for Google to implement a domain network.  (I'm pretty sure we've discussed this in the past either on your blog or mine.  Sorry to repeat but I think it's worth mentioning again to your readers.)

If Google has an AdWords content network for AdSense for Content traffic, why not an AdWords domain network for AdSense for Domains traffic?  This would give advertisers visibility into where their clicks are going and how they're converting.  The current practice of distributing the AdSense for Domains traffic across both the search and content networks on AdWords simply confuses and exasperates PPC advertisers.

Also, advertisers can block individual content sites via a site exclusion tool.  This feature would be necessary on a domain network because there are some useless parked domains in the AdSense for Domains program.  I've had clients waste money on traffic from these non-generic domain names with little recourse but to block entire parked domain services.  For instance, it is possible to block all searchportal.information.com traffic by adding domainsponsor.com to the site exclusion list.  That blocks traffic on the search network as well as the content network.  It's not a good solution, though, as there may be some generic parked domains that are powered by searchportal.information.com.

Hope you don't mind the long comment.  ;-)

----ANSWER----

Hi Richard,
Not at all, pleasure to read :)
My main problem is arbitrage players which reduce the value of our potent traffic. As for my company, we do not do arbitrage. I have no problem with those who do arbitrage but putting them in the domain channel, as they do it on domain portfolios, reduces the value of those who don't.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sahar.  Thanks for the link.</p>
<p>Blocking all parked domains via AdWords is not the best solution.  I do think a win-win-win (for Google and advertisers and domainers) would be for Google to implement a domain network.  (I&#8217;m pretty sure we&#8217;ve discussed this in the past either on your blog or mine.  Sorry to repeat but I think it&#8217;s worth mentioning again to your readers.)</p>
<p>If Google has an AdWords content network for AdSense for Content traffic, why not an AdWords domain network for AdSense for Domains traffic?  This would give advertisers visibility into where their clicks are going and how they&#8217;re converting.  The current practice of distributing the AdSense for Domains traffic across both the search and content networks on AdWords simply confuses and exasperates PPC advertisers.</p>
<p>Also, advertisers can block individual content sites via a site exclusion tool.  This feature would be necessary on a domain network because there are some useless parked domains in the AdSense for Domains program.  I&#8217;ve had clients waste money on traffic from these non-generic domain names with little recourse but to block entire parked domain services.  For instance, it is possible to block all searchportal.information.com traffic by adding domainsponsor.com to the site exclusion list.  That blocks traffic on the search network as well as the content network.  It&#8217;s not a good solution, though, as there may be some generic parked domains that are powered by searchportal.information.com.</p>
<p>Hope you don&#8217;t mind the long comment.  <img src='http://www.conceptualist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8212;-ANSWER&#8212;-</p>
<p>Hi Richard,<br />
Not at all, pleasure to read <img src='http://www.conceptualist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
My main problem is arbitrage players which reduce the value of our potent traffic. As for my company, we do not do arbitrage. I have no problem with those who do arbitrage but putting them in the domain channel, as they do it on domain portfolios, reduces the value of those who don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/08/03/coming-soon-opt-out-option-for-adsense-for-domains-advertisers/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.conceptualist.com/2007/08/03/coming-soon-opt-out-option-for-adsense-for-domains-advertisers/#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>Shalom Sahar,

Is this for real? Google will be cutting off their blood supply. Parked domains are a huge business for domainers, advertisers and of course google. We've seen many stories about how much better direct navigation converts, your facebook story a few weeks back is a perfect example.

Advertisers need to be educated about where their traffic and conversions are coming from. Maybe, it's time for google to share a little more info and show the world the power of direct navigation.

regards,
Gil

----ANSWER----

Many in the domain channel have reognized the biggest risk to our business is having two main players monetizing the channel. If domainers who use domainPark see a substantial decrease in revenue they will be moving to Yahoo. Can Google take that kind of loss on their bottom line? I'm sure Yahoo will be waiting with open arms.

The market will work it out. At this moment I'm not so much worried as both Yahoo and google need the domain channel just as much as we need them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shalom Sahar,</p>
<p>Is this for real? Google will be cutting off their blood supply. Parked domains are a huge business for domainers, advertisers and of course google. We&#8217;ve seen many stories about how much better direct navigation converts, your facebook story a few weeks back is a perfect example.</p>
<p>Advertisers need to be educated about where their traffic and conversions are coming from. Maybe, it&#8217;s time for google to share a little more info and show the world the power of direct navigation.</p>
<p>regards,<br />
Gil</p>
<p>&#8212;-ANSWER&#8212;-</p>
<p>Many in the domain channel have reognized the biggest risk to our business is having two main players monetizing the channel. If domainers who use domainPark see a substantial decrease in revenue they will be moving to Yahoo. Can Google take that kind of loss on their bottom line? I&#8217;m sure Yahoo will be waiting with open arms.</p>
<p>The market will work it out. At this moment I&#8217;m not so much worried as both Yahoo and google need the domain channel just as much as we need them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
